In return for fewer features than Keynote, Flowvella prioritizes the experience of the user (me) and how this experience translates to-and interacts with-my viewers (students). Actually, Stephen Fry: With this new line of thinking I surveyed other presentation programs and chose.
Flowvella alternatives how to#
And while I know good design when I see it, I don’t know how to construct it! So why not simply get a hold of good templates and go from there? It’s because design-I know this much-is more than simply the right image.
Flowvella alternatives software#
But if software interface DOES shape our thinking, then things become interesting: to marshal Marshall McLuhan (and abuse him along the way) the software interface is the message When I begin approaching the ‘interface as the message’, it became apparent that I (1) need only a fraction Keynote's power and (2) am always slightly dissatisfied with how the slides show and integrate into the act of teaching. This process has shown me, separate from this blog even, that I value about design far more than I had realized.
Ilios-students On FlowvellaneĪnd this was the reason I chose Keynote many years ago. In my teaching preparation, I too work with a keyboard: a laptop with software and this raises a question: like the piano, does my chosen software encourage or discourage creative shaping of ideas? If software interface plays no role in shaping our teaching, then a program with multiple features, offering the greatest possible customization, is likely best. And here creativity defined not as not a feeling of inspiration-but a complex bodily engagement involving experimentation, listening, and problem solving. More than passing correct notes on to the audience, practice is a creative shaping of ideas. How might a performative approach helps insure that we shape software to our ends, and not the other way around? In music, the quality of the practice experience determines the quality of the performance.
0 kommentar(er)
